A selection of our recent appearances in the UK media.
28 April 2023
Research by the non-profit organisation More in Common found that the cost of living crisis was the most important issue for voters.
This was followed by 'supporting the NHS', 'climate change and the environment', 'asylum seekers crossing the Channel' and 'the war in Ukraine'.
27 April 2023
Participants said Mr Sunak was a millionaire, his wife was a millionaire and that he's "got cash in all sorts of places".
Luke Tryl, UK director at More in Common, which conducted the research, said the focus group revealed the sense the PM was "just too rich to be in touch" with voters.
He said: "There's another group who say, 'oh he's so wealthy, he must be in politics for the right reasons, he can't be bought'. But more people are likely to say that, 'actually he just can't relate to my life'."
26 April 2023
And the focus-group evidence is that undecided voters tend to see Sunak’s wealth as reflecting well on him, while paradoxically regarding Starmer as a member of the privileged elite. Luke Tryl of More in Common once reported a group that thought the Labour leader’s knighthood was the equivalent of a hereditary peerage.
22 April 2023
More in Common UK Director Luke Tryl discusses the two parties and the main priorities among voters in the lead-up to the May local council elections
19 April 2023
Op-ed by UK Director Luke Tryl: Poor taste,’ said Julie, ‘Really desperate,’ added Shawn. Mark thought it was ‘A low blow’ and Becky was simply ‘gobsmacked’. That was the verdict of our focus group participants in Erewash in Derbyshire last week when they were shown Labour’s controversial advert suggesting Rishi Sunak did not believe that those convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison.
19 April 2023
Luke Tryl, UK director of research consultancy More in Common, said previous extreme tactics by groups like Extinction Rebellion had put some people off the climate movement. "In fact only 22% of the public say they think Extinction Rebellion has been a force for good, and there is a real danger that a further round of disruptive protests will ultimately do more harm than good for the cause of motivating climate action."